Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
| Fixtures10 ft apart along 170 ft | 18fixtures |
|---|---|
| Total load18 × 7 W — 10.5 A | 126W |
| Transformer158 W needed at the 80% rule — never run one at full rating | 200W |
| Headroom leftroom for about 5 more fixtures | 37% |
| Cable sizesplit the run into two circuits | over 8 AWG |
| — Voltage drop by cable — | |
| 16 AWGthe last fixtures will look dim | 74.2%3.1 V at the end |
| 14 AWGthe last fixtures will look dim | 46.7%6.4 V at the end |
| 12 AWGthe last fixtures will look dim | 29.5%8.5 V at the end |
| 10 AWGthe last fixtures will look dim | 18.4%9.8 V at the end |
| 8 AWGthe last fixtures will look dim | 11.6%10.6 V at the end |
- Run length
- 170 ft
- Fixture spacing
- 10 ft
- Fixture wattage
- 7 W
Three numbers, and they have to be worked out together
18 fixtures at 10 ft along 170 ft, drawing 126 W — 10.5 A at 12 volts.
A 200 W transformer. The load needs 158 W once you apply the 80% rule, and that rule is not conservatism: a transformer run at its nameplate rating runs hot, and heat is what kills them.
larger than 8 AWG cable, which holds % drop and leaves V at the far end.
The one way these systems fail
The fixtures at the end are dimmer than the ones at the start. It is always voltage drop, and it is always discovered after the cable is buried.
12 V LED fixtures want 10.5–15 V. Below that they visibly dim and some flicker; above it they fail early. Ten percent is the practical ceiling on drop, and it is what the cable above is sized to.
Half the current, and that is correct
With 18 fixtures spread evenly, the full 10.5 A only flows in the first section of cable — by the far end almost nothing is left. This calculation uses the midpoint current, which is the honest way to do it. Treating the whole load as flowing the whole 170 ft doubles the apparent drop and sells you twice the copper.
Two free fixes
Feed the run from the middle rather than one end. That halves the effective distance and roughly quarters the drop, and it costs nothing but a different trench route.
And leave headroom on purpose. Landscape lighting always grows — one more fixture at the new tree, two more along the path. There is room for about 5 more 7 W fixtures on this transformer before it needs replacing.
Notes
- Low-voltage landscape lighting fails in exactly one way: the fixtures at the end are dimmer than the ones at the start. Even 8 AWG cannot hold this run inside 10% — split it into two circuits fed from opposite ends of the transformer.
- Current is halved in this calculation, and that is correct. With 18 fixtures spread evenly, the full 10.5 A only flows in the first section of cable; by the far end almost nothing is left. Calculating as if all of it ran the whole 170 ft doubles the apparent drop and sells you twice the copper.
- The 80% rule on the transformer is not conservatism. A transformer run at its nameplate rating runs hot, and heat is what kills them — 126 W of load wants a 200 W unit, not a 126 W one.
- Leave headroom deliberately. Landscape lighting always grows: one more fixture at the new tree, two more along the path. There is room for about 5 more 7 W fixtures on this transformer before it needs replacing.
- Feeding the run from the middle rather than one end halves the effective distance and roughly quarters the drop. It is the cheapest fix available and it costs nothing but a different trench route.
- 12 V LED fixtures want 10.5–15 V. Below that they dim visibly and some flicker; above it they fail early. Multi-tap transformers with 13, 14 and 15 V terminals exist precisely so you can compensate a long run — but sizing the cable properly is the better answer.
Nearby sizes
- Landscape lighting for a 160 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 180 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 150 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 190 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 8 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 12 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 6 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 15 ft spacing with 7 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 5 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 9 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 4 W fixtures
- Landscape lighting for a 170 ft run at 10 ft spacing with 12 W fixtures
Read more
- 2700K vs 3000K: A Difference You Only See Side by SideShown separately, almost nobody can tell 2700K from 3000K. Shown together, everybody can. That single fact decides how you should buy them.
- 3000K or 4000K in a Kitchen? Look at the Worktop, Not the ChartMost advice picks a number and defends it. The honest answer is that 3000K and 4000K are both correct, in different kitchens, and the deciding factor is what the light lands on.
- Vanity Lighting: Why the Fitting Position Beats the LumensA vanity is a face-lighting problem, not a room-lighting problem. Almost every bad bathroom light is a fitting in the wrong place rather than a fitting that is too dim.
- Bedroom Lumens: The Room Where Less Is the SpecificationThe bedroom is the only room where the target is a range you should deliberately sit at the bottom of, and where the dimmest setting matters more than the brightest.